The Supremacy Clause LES week 3 discussion help

a good writer in law here are the instructions please make shore you add references and citations  thanks:

The Supremacy Clause makes it clear that when state law is in conflict with federal law, federal law preempts state law. There have been many lawsuits claiming that state laws conflict with federal laws and are therefore invalid. In our reading this week, your textbook gives several examples, like Gade and Cippoloni.  In Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006), the court considered whether Congress, in enacting the Controlled Substances Act, intended to preempt state laws such as that of Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act, which authorized physicians to prescribe lethal doses of controlled drugs for terminally ill patients.

Using and applying the principles that we have learned about in chapter six of our textbook, provide another example of where states have been sued for trying to preempt a federal law. 
Your example should include:

  • a proper citation for the case
  • a brief summary
  • the final holding of the case and properly apply the terms and concepts from this week’s reading.
  • Students should not repeat an example that has already been used.

Resources for Assessment:

  • Textbook Readings: Constitutional Law Principles & Practice, chapter 6

  • Websites:

    you can google the book name to find the etext of the book  the name of the book is Constitutional Law Principles & Practice

    Disclaimer: It is illegal to use the research material ordered on this website for other than research purposes. You must quote the sources appropriately. The company bears no responsibility for the use of research work, not intended for education use, the work is sold as-is with the highest quality and service available and written by freelancers.